Now China Wants Law And Order

Sunset of the Forbidden City, Beijing (northwe...

Sunset of the Forbidden City, Beijing (northwest cornor of the Forbidden City) (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

June 11, 2012: Jianyu Huang, a Chinese scientist working in the United States, has been arrested and charged with passing stolen technology back to China. Huang was fired from his nanotechnology research job in April and has been charged with stealing and lying to security officials about these activities. Huang was born in China but moved to the U.S. and became an American citizen.

American intelligence and counter-intelligence agencies have increasingly been paying close attention to Chinese born American scientists, seeking out the minority that use their access to American technology secrets to either give or sell this valuable material to government or commercial organizations in China. This is all part of extensive Chinese intelligence efforts to steal American technology.

China sees this kind of broad-spectrum intelligence gathering as a major operation and one they intend to keep going as long as possible. Thus, during the last four years China has established eight National Intelligence Colleges in major universities. In effect, each school now has an “Espionage Department”. With this about 300 carefully selected applicants are accepted each year, to be trained as spies and intelligence operatives, and future commanders of these operations. The college trained operatives expect to make a career out of stealing Western technology. China has found that espionage is an enormously profitable way to steal military and commercial secrets. While Chinese Cyber War operations in this area get a lot of publicity, the more conventional spying brings in a lot of stuff that is not reachable on the Internet.

Continue reading

Watching Over You

Allowing citizens access to the internet without ‘compromising’ the regime – it’s a balancing act that some states are finding difficult to achieve and others have no intention of fulfilling. Today’s maps show the countries where you need to take heed of what you do online.

Prepared by: ISN Staff

clip_image002

Amnesty International poster on Chinese internet censorship

Allowing citizens access to the internet without ‘compromising’ the regime – it’s a balancing act that some states are finding difficult to achieve and others have no intention of fulfilling. Today’s maps show the countries where you need to take heed of what you do online.

Yesterday we kludged together Gene Sharp’s philosophy of nonviolent resistance with Clay Shirky’s belief that social media is a revolutionary instrument of political change. Our intention was indeed to celebrate the potential empowerment this media can provide the average person in the street. But as we also mentioned yesterday, every positive has its negative. In the case of Sharp and Shirky, it is Evgeny Morozov’s belief that internet-based media can be used, and indeed is used, by repressive regimes to maintain their grip on power. (They do so by gathering open source intelligence, co-opting bloggers, planting legitimacy-enhancing narratives, etc.)

Continue reading

The dangerous debate over cutting military spending

U.S. Defense Spending Trends from 2000-2011

Image via Wikipedia

By Robert J. Samuelson, Monday, October 31, 12:50 AM

We shouldn’t gut defense. A central question of our budget debates is how much we allow growing spending on social programs to crowd out the military and, in effect, force the United States into a dangerous, slow-motion disarmament.

People who see military cuts as an easy way to reduce budget deficits forget that this has already occurred. From the late 1980s to 2010, the number of America’s armed forces dropped from 2.1 million men and women to about 1.4 million. The downsizing — the “peace dividend” from the end of the Cold War — was not undone by the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Continue reading

The Region: F for failure

The political power structure of Iran, inspire...
Image via Wikipedia

Jan 24, 2010 21:10 | Updated Jan 25, 2010 17:19

By BARRY RUBIN

We must now face an extremely unpleasant truth: Even giving the Obama administration every possible break regarding its Iran policy, it is now clear that the US government isn’t going to take strong action on the nuclear weapons issue. Note that I didn’t even say “effective” action, I’m saying that it isn’t even going to make a good show of trying seriously to do anything.

Some say that the administration has secretly or implicitly accepted the idea that Iran will get nuclear weapons and is now seeking some longer-term containment policy. I doubt that has happened. It is just not even this close to reality. Continue reading